{"id":166708,"date":"2026-01-17T13:14:05","date_gmt":"2026-01-17T13:14:05","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/dev.creativewalkers.com\/pa\/?page_id=166708"},"modified":"2026-02-23T12:34:22","modified_gmt":"2026-02-23T12:34:22","slug":"the-right-to-physical-integrity","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/dev.creativewalkers.com\/pa\/adjudication\/the-right-to-physical-integrity\/","title":{"rendered":"The right to physical integrity"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"wpb-content-wrapper\"><p>[vc_row unlock_row_content=&#8221;yes&#8221; row_height_percent=&#8221;0&#8243; override_padding=&#8221;yes&#8221; h_padding=&#8221;7&#8243; top_padding=&#8221;7&#8243; bottom_padding=&#8221;7&#8243; back_image=&#8221;166597&#8243; back_position=&#8221;center center&#8221; overlay_alpha=&#8221;50&#8243; overlay_color_blend=&#8221;multiply&#8221; gutter_size=&#8221;3&#8243; column_width_percent=&#8221;100&#8243; shift_y=&#8221;0&#8243; z_index=&#8221;0&#8243; bottom_divider=&#8221;gradient&#8221; css_animation=&#8221;scroll-trigger&#8221; animation_state=&#8221;end&#8221; animation_origin=&#8221;center&#8221; animation_scale_val=&#8221;100&#8243; animation_opacity=&#8221;0&#8243; animation_x=&#8221;0&#8243; animation_y=&#8221;0&#8243; animation_blur=&#8221;0&#8243; animation_rotate=&#8221;0&#8243; animation_perspective=&#8221;0&#8243; animation_offset_top=&#8221;0&#8243; animation_offset_bottom=&#8221;85&#8243; content_parallax=&#8221;3&#8243; uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;497015&#8243; overlay_color_type=&#8221;uncode-solid&#8221; overlay_color_solid=&#8221;#0c4f48&#8243;][vc_column column_width_percent=&#8221;100&#8243; position_vertical=&#8221;bottom&#8221; gutter_size=&#8221;4&#8243; style=&#8221;dark&#8221; overlay_alpha=&#8221;50&#8243; shift_x=&#8221;0&#8243; shift_y=&#8221;0&#8243; shift_y_down=&#8221;0&#8243; z_index=&#8221;0&#8243; medium_width=&#8221;0&#8243; mobile_width=&#8221;0&#8243; width=&#8221;1\/1&#8243; uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;171104&#8243;][vc_row_inner row_inner_height_percent=&#8221;0&#8243; force_width_grid=&#8221;yes&#8221; overlay_alpha=&#8221;50&#8243; gutter_size=&#8221;3&#8243; shift_y=&#8221;0&#8243; z_index=&#8221;0&#8243; limit_content=&#8221;&#8221; uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;804868&#8243;][vc_column_inner column_width_percent=&#8221;100&#8243; position_horizontal=&#8221;left&#8221; gutter_size=&#8221;3&#8243; style=&#8221;dark&#8221; overlay_alpha=&#8221;50&#8243; shift_x=&#8221;0&#8243; shift_y=&#8221;0&#8243; shift_y_down=&#8221;0&#8243; z_index=&#8221;0&#8243; medium_width=&#8221;0&#8243; mobile_width=&#8221;0&#8243; width=&#8221;9\/12&#8243; uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;311432&#8243;][vc_custom_heading heading_semantic=&#8221;h3&#8243; text_font=&#8221;font-161747&#8243; text_size=&#8221;custom&#8221; text_weight=&#8221;300&#8243; text_space=&#8221;fontspace-111509&#8243; uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;167084&#8243; heading_custom_size=&#8221;clamp(50px,7vw,125px)&#8221;]Adjudication[\/vc_custom_heading][vc_custom_heading text_color=&#8221;color-xsdn&#8221; heading_semantic=&#8221;h6&#8243; uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;168564&#8243; text_color_type=&#8221;uncode-palette&#8221;]THE RIGHT TO PHYSICAL INTEGRITY[\/vc_custom_heading][\/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner column_width_percent=&#8221;100&#8243; gutter_size=&#8221;3&#8243; overlay_alpha=&#8221;50&#8243; shift_x=&#8221;0&#8243; shift_y=&#8221;0&#8243; shift_y_down=&#8221;0&#8243; z_index=&#8221;0&#8243; medium_visibility=&#8221;yes&#8221; medium_width=&#8221;0&#8243; mobile_visibility=&#8221;yes&#8221; mobile_width=&#8221;0&#8243; width=&#8221;3\/12&#8243; uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;100417&#8243;][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row unlock_row_content=&#8221;yes&#8221; row_height_percent=&#8221;0&#8243; override_padding=&#8221;yes&#8221; h_padding=&#8221;2&#8243; top_padding=&#8221;2&#8243; bottom_padding=&#8221;2&#8243; back_color=&#8221;color-xsdn&#8221; overlay_alpha=&#8221;50&#8243; gutter_size=&#8221;3&#8243; column_width_percent=&#8221;100&#8243; shift_y=&#8221;0&#8243; z_index=&#8221;0&#8243; content_parallax=&#8221;0&#8243; uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;111866&#8243; back_color_type=&#8221;uncode-palette&#8221;][vc_column column_width_percent=&#8221;100&#8243; gutter_size=&#8221;4&#8243; override_padding=&#8221;yes&#8221; column_padding=&#8221;5&#8243; back_color=&#8221;color-xsdn&#8221; overlay_alpha=&#8221;50&#8243; radius=&#8221;std&#8221; shift_x=&#8221;0&#8243; shift_y=&#8221;0&#8243; shift_y_down=&#8221;0&#8243; z_index=&#8221;0&#8243; medium_width=&#8221;0&#8243; mobile_width=&#8221;0&#8243; width=&#8221;1\/1&#8243; uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;126585&#8243; back_color_type=&#8221;uncode-palette&#8221;][vc_accordion no_toggle=&#8221;yes&#8221; gutter_simple=&#8221;0&#8243; active_tab=&#8221;0&#8243; uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;291747&#8243;][vc_accordion_tab gutter_size=&#8221;2&#8243; column_padding=&#8221;2&#8243; title=&#8221;Grand Chamber Judgments&#8221; tab_id=&#8221;d21d5937-3bb0-215556789140011555679505952d6a2-ca1e&#8221;][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner width=&#8221;2\/3&#8243;][vc_empty_space empty_h=&#8221;1&#8243;][vc_column_text uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;185981&#8243;]X AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA (application no. 22457\/16, judgment of 2 February 2021): failure to use all reasonable investigative and international cooperation measures while examining sexual abuse in an orphanage alleged after children\u2019s adoption abroad, in accordance with the Lanzarote Convention.[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner column_width_percent=&#8221;100&#8243; position_vertical=&#8221;middle&#8221; gutter_size=&#8221;3&#8243; overlay_alpha=&#8221;50&#8243; shift_x=&#8221;0&#8243; shift_y=&#8221;0&#8243; shift_y_down=&#8221;0&#8243; z_index=&#8221;0&#8243; medium_width=&#8221;0&#8243; mobile_width=&#8221;0&#8243; width=&#8221;1\/3&#8243; uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;152120&#8243;][vc_empty_space empty_h=&#8221;1&#8243;][vc_button radius=&#8221;btn-round&#8221; border_width=&#8221;0&#8243; button_color_type=&#8221;uncode-solid&#8221; button_color_solid=&#8221;#0c4f48&#8243; uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;717551&#8243; link=&#8221;url:https%3A%2F%2Fhudoc.echr.coe.int%2Feng%2F%23%7B%2522itemid%2522%3A%5B%2522001-207953%2522%5D%7D|target:_blank&#8221;]Access Decision[\/vc_button][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner width=&#8221;2\/3&#8243;][vc_empty_space empty_h=&#8221;1&#8243;][vc_column_text uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;112805&#8243;]HUTCHINSON v. THE UNITED KINGDOM (application no. 57592\/08, judgment of 17 January 2017): whole life sentence without any legally based parole mechanism in<br \/>\nspite of ECHR\u2019s judgment imposing the adoption of such mechanism by the UK, the Court\u2019s judgment as res interpretata, State obligation to \u201ctake into account\u201d the judgments of the Court, Argentoratum locutum, iudicium finitum \u2013 \u201cStrasbourg has spoken, the case is closed\u201d, universalism and diversity in human rights.[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner column_width_percent=&#8221;100&#8243; position_vertical=&#8221;middle&#8221; gutter_size=&#8221;3&#8243; overlay_alpha=&#8221;50&#8243; shift_x=&#8221;0&#8243; shift_y=&#8221;0&#8243; shift_y_down=&#8221;0&#8243; z_index=&#8221;0&#8243; medium_width=&#8221;0&#8243; mobile_width=&#8221;0&#8243; width=&#8221;1\/3&#8243; uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;152120&#8243;][vc_empty_space empty_h=&#8221;1&#8243;][vc_button radius=&#8221;btn-round&#8221; border_width=&#8221;0&#8243; button_color_type=&#8221;uncode-solid&#8221; button_color_solid=&#8221;#0c4f48&#8243; uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;201152&#8243; link=&#8221;url:https%3A%2F%2Fhudoc.echr.coe.int%2Feng%23%7B%2522itemid%2522%3A%5B%2522001-170347%2522%5D%7D|target:_blank&#8221;]Access Decision[\/vc_button][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner width=&#8221;2\/3&#8243;][vc_empty_space empty_h=&#8221;1&#8243;][vc_column_text uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;145679&#8243;]MURSIC v. CROATIA (application no. 7334\/13, judgment of 20 October 2016): prison overcrowding, the minimum living space in a multiple-occupancy cell, European consensus and the CPT standards, the role of soft law in European human rights law, evolutive interpretation of the European Convention on Human Rights.[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner column_width_percent=&#8221;100&#8243; position_vertical=&#8221;middle&#8221; gutter_size=&#8221;3&#8243; overlay_alpha=&#8221;50&#8243; shift_x=&#8221;0&#8243; shift_y=&#8221;0&#8243; shift_y_down=&#8221;0&#8243; z_index=&#8221;0&#8243; medium_width=&#8221;0&#8243; mobile_width=&#8221;0&#8243; width=&#8221;1\/3&#8243; uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;152120&#8243;][vc_empty_space empty_h=&#8221;1&#8243;][vc_button radius=&#8221;btn-round&#8221; border_width=&#8221;0&#8243; button_color_type=&#8221;uncode-solid&#8221; button_color_solid=&#8221;#0c4f48&#8243; uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;265285&#8243; link=&#8221;url:https%3A%2F%2Fhudoc.echr.coe.int%2Feng%23%7B%2522itemid%2522%3A%5B%2522001-167483%2522%5D%7D|target:_blank&#8221;]Access Decision[\/vc_button][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner width=&#8221;2\/3&#8243;][vc_empty_space empty_h=&#8221;1&#8243;][vc_column_text uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;103445&#8243;]MURRAY v. THE NETHERLANDS (application no. 10511\/10, judgment of 26 April 2016): detention of mentally ill prisoner for more than thirty-four years without any<br \/>\nkind of psychiatric or psychological treatment, State obligation to promote 16\/103 resocialisation of prisoners through individualised sentence plans and to provide for a<br \/>\njudicial, fair and objective mechanism of review of the penological needs for continued incarceration.[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner column_width_percent=&#8221;100&#8243; position_vertical=&#8221;middle&#8221; gutter_size=&#8221;3&#8243; overlay_alpha=&#8221;50&#8243; shift_x=&#8221;0&#8243; shift_y=&#8221;0&#8243; shift_y_down=&#8221;0&#8243; z_index=&#8221;0&#8243; medium_width=&#8221;0&#8243; mobile_width=&#8221;0&#8243; width=&#8221;1\/3&#8243; uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;152120&#8243;][vc_empty_space empty_h=&#8221;1&#8243;][vc_button radius=&#8221;btn-round&#8221; border_width=&#8221;0&#8243; button_color_type=&#8221;uncode-solid&#8221; button_color_solid=&#8221;#0c4f48&#8243; uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;957331&#8243; link=&#8221;url:https%3A%2F%2Fhudoc.echr.coe.int%2Feng%23%7B%2522itemid%2522%3A%5B%2522001-162614%2522%5D%7D|target:_blank&#8221;]Access Decision[\/vc_button][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner width=&#8221;2\/3&#8243;][vc_empty_space empty_h=&#8221;1&#8243;][vc_column_text uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;239945&#8243;]S.J. v. BELGIUM (application no. 70055\/10, judgment of 19 March 2015): procedure for expulsion of terminally ill foreigner, discontinuance of the ECHR case based on Government promise to take care of the applicant, but without any undertaking regarding all other people in the same circumstances[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner column_width_percent=&#8221;100&#8243; position_vertical=&#8221;middle&#8221; gutter_size=&#8221;3&#8243; overlay_alpha=&#8221;50&#8243; shift_x=&#8221;0&#8243; shift_y=&#8221;0&#8243; shift_y_down=&#8221;0&#8243; z_index=&#8221;0&#8243; medium_width=&#8221;0&#8243; mobile_width=&#8221;0&#8243; width=&#8221;1\/3&#8243; uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;152120&#8243;][vc_empty_space empty_h=&#8221;1&#8243;][vc_button radius=&#8221;btn-round&#8221; border_width=&#8221;0&#8243; button_color_type=&#8221;uncode-solid&#8221; button_color_solid=&#8221;#0c4f48&#8243; uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;417637&#8243; link=&#8221;url:https%3A%2F%2Fhudoc.echr.coe.int%2Feng%23%7B%2522itemid%2522%3A%5B%2522001-141668%2522%5D%7D|target:_blank&#8221;]Access Decision[\/vc_button][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner width=&#8221;2\/3&#8243;][vc_empty_space empty_h=&#8221;1&#8243;][vc_column_text uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;154930&#8243;]HIRSI JAMAA AND OTHERS v. ITALY (application no. 27765\/09, judgment of 23 February 2012): collective refoulement of asylum seekers in a \u201cpush-back\u201d operation on the high seas.[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner column_width_percent=&#8221;100&#8243; position_vertical=&#8221;middle&#8221; gutter_size=&#8221;3&#8243; overlay_alpha=&#8221;50&#8243; shift_x=&#8221;0&#8243; shift_y=&#8221;0&#8243; shift_y_down=&#8221;0&#8243; z_index=&#8221;0&#8243; medium_width=&#8221;0&#8243; mobile_width=&#8221;0&#8243; width=&#8221;1\/3&#8243; uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;152120&#8243;][vc_empty_space empty_h=&#8221;1&#8243;][vc_button radius=&#8221;btn-round&#8221; border_width=&#8221;0&#8243; button_color_type=&#8221;uncode-solid&#8221; button_color_solid=&#8221;#0c4f48&#8243; uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;215484&#8243; link=&#8221;url:https%3A%2F%2Fhudoc.echr.coe.int%2Ffre%23%7B%2522itemid%2522%3A%5B%2522001-109231%2522%5D%7D|target:_blank&#8221;]Access Decision[\/vc_button][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][\/vc_accordion_tab][vc_accordion_tab gutter_size=&#8221;2&#8243; column_padding=&#8221;2&#8243; title=&#8221;Section I Judgments&#8221; tab_id=&#8221;6dad8f3c-7309-815556789140011555679505952d6a2-ca1e&#8221;][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner width=&#8221;2\/3&#8243;][vc_empty_space empty_h=&#8221;1&#8243;][vc_column_text uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;271625&#8243;]TAGAYEVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (application no. 26562\/07 and 6 other applications, judgment of 13 April 2017): large-scale attack on a school and deficient anti terrorist operation which left more than 330 people dead, State obligation to prevent, plan, control and use lethal force in anti-terrorist operations in accordance with \u201cstrict necessity\u201d test, amnesty to police officers involved.[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner column_width_percent=&#8221;100&#8243; position_vertical=&#8221;middle&#8221; gutter_size=&#8221;3&#8243; overlay_alpha=&#8221;50&#8243; shift_x=&#8221;0&#8243; shift_y=&#8221;0&#8243; shift_y_down=&#8221;0&#8243; z_index=&#8221;0&#8243; medium_width=&#8221;0&#8243; mobile_width=&#8221;0&#8243; width=&#8221;1\/3&#8243; uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;152120&#8243;][vc_empty_space empty_h=&#8221;1&#8243;][vc_button radius=&#8221;btn-round&#8221; border_width=&#8221;0&#8243; button_color_type=&#8221;uncode-solid&#8221; button_color_solid=&#8221;#0c4f48&#8243; uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;249529&#8243; link=&#8221;url:https%3A%2F%2Fhudoc.echr.coe.int%2Feng%23%7B%2522itemid%2522%3A%5B%2522001-172660%2522%5D%7D|target:_blank&#8221;]Access Decision[\/vc_button][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner width=&#8221;2\/3&#8243;][vc_empty_space empty_h=&#8221;1&#8243;][vc_column_text uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;247731&#8243;]BLJAKAJ AND OTHERS v. CROATIA (application no. 74448\/12, judgment of 18 September 2014): lawyer in a divorce action threatened and attacked by the adverse party, State obligation to protect lawyers from work-related violence and against violent acts of mentally disturbed persons.[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner column_width_percent=&#8221;100&#8243; position_vertical=&#8221;middle&#8221; gutter_size=&#8221;3&#8243; overlay_alpha=&#8221;50&#8243; shift_x=&#8221;0&#8243; shift_y=&#8221;0&#8243; shift_y_down=&#8221;0&#8243; z_index=&#8221;0&#8243; medium_width=&#8221;0&#8243; mobile_width=&#8221;0&#8243; width=&#8221;1\/3&#8243; uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;152120&#8243;][vc_empty_space empty_h=&#8221;1&#8243;][vc_button radius=&#8221;btn-round&#8221; border_width=&#8221;0&#8243; button_color_type=&#8221;uncode-solid&#8221; button_color_solid=&#8221;#0c4f48&#8243; uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;173803&#8243; link=&#8221;url:https%3A%2F%2Fhudoc.echr.coe.int%2Feng%23%7B%2522itemid%2522%3A%5B%2522001-146392%2522%5D%7D|target:_blank&#8221;]Access Decision[\/vc_button][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][\/vc_accordion_tab][vc_accordion_tab gutter_size=&#8221;2&#8243; column_padding=&#8221;2&#8243; title=&#8221;Section II Judgments&#8221; tab_id=&#8221;9346230d-a835-915556789140011555679505952d6a2-ca1e&#8221;][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner width=&#8221;2\/3&#8243;][vc_empty_space empty_h=&#8221;1&#8243;][vc_column_text uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;812107&#8243;]CAMEKAN v. TURKEY (application no. 54241\/08, judgment of 28 January 2014): self-defence, reassessment of facts by the ECHR, principle of subsidiarity.[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner column_width_percent=&#8221;100&#8243; position_vertical=&#8221;middle&#8221; gutter_size=&#8221;3&#8243; overlay_alpha=&#8221;50&#8243; shift_x=&#8221;0&#8243; shift_y=&#8221;0&#8243; shift_y_down=&#8221;0&#8243; z_index=&#8221;0&#8243; medium_width=&#8221;0&#8243; mobile_width=&#8221;0&#8243; width=&#8221;1\/3&#8243; uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;152120&#8243;][vc_empty_space empty_h=&#8221;1&#8243;][vc_button radius=&#8221;btn-round&#8221; border_width=&#8221;0&#8243; button_color_type=&#8221;uncode-solid&#8221; button_color_solid=&#8221;#0c4f48&#8243; uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;109033&#8243; link=&#8221;url:https%3A%2F%2Fhudoc.echr.coe.int%2Feng-press%23%7B%2522itemid%2522%3A%5B%2522003-4649529-5631983%2522%5D%7D|target:_blank&#8221;]Access Decision[\/vc_button][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner width=&#8221;2\/3&#8243;][vc_empty_space empty_h=&#8221;1&#8243;][vc_column_text uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;377447&#8243;]PERIN\u00c7EK v. SWITZERLAND (application no. 27510\/08, judgment of 17 December 2013): denial of the Armenian genocide in a public conference, State obligation to criminalize the denial of genocide.[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner column_width_percent=&#8221;100&#8243; position_vertical=&#8221;middle&#8221; gutter_size=&#8221;3&#8243; overlay_alpha=&#8221;50&#8243; shift_x=&#8221;0&#8243; shift_y=&#8221;0&#8243; shift_y_down=&#8221;0&#8243; z_index=&#8221;0&#8243; medium_width=&#8221;0&#8243; mobile_width=&#8221;0&#8243; width=&#8221;1\/3&#8243; uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;152120&#8243;][vc_empty_space empty_h=&#8221;1&#8243;][vc_button radius=&#8221;btn-round&#8221; border_width=&#8221;0&#8243; button_color_type=&#8221;uncode-solid&#8221; button_color_solid=&#8221;#0c4f48&#8243; uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;320802&#8243; link=&#8221;url:https%3A%2F%2Fhudoc.echr.coe.int%2Feng%23%7B%2522itemid%2522%3A%5B%2522001-158235%2522%5D%7D|target:_blank&#8221;]Access Decision[\/vc_button][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner width=&#8221;2\/3&#8243;][vc_empty_space empty_h=&#8221;1&#8243;][vc_column_text uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;946605&#8243;]TREVALEC v. BELGIUM (application no. 30812\/07, judgment of 14 June 2011): journalist injured by mistake by police officers who thought that he was attacking them, putative and excessive self-defence.[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner column_width_percent=&#8221;100&#8243; position_vertical=&#8221;middle&#8221; gutter_size=&#8221;3&#8243; overlay_alpha=&#8221;50&#8243; shift_x=&#8221;0&#8243; shift_y=&#8221;0&#8243; shift_y_down=&#8221;0&#8243; z_index=&#8221;0&#8243; medium_width=&#8221;0&#8243; mobile_width=&#8221;0&#8243; width=&#8221;1\/3&#8243; uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;152120&#8243;][vc_empty_space empty_h=&#8221;1&#8243;][vc_button radius=&#8221;btn-round&#8221; border_width=&#8221;0&#8243; button_color_type=&#8221;uncode-solid&#8221; button_color_solid=&#8221;#0c4f48&#8243; uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;236115&#8243; link=&#8221;url:https%3A%2F%2Fhudoc.echr.coe.int%2Feng%23%7B%2522itemid%2522%3A%5B%2522002-456%2522%5D%7D|target:_blank&#8221;]Access Decision[\/vc_button][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][\/vc_accordion_tab][vc_accordion_tab gutter_size=&#8221;2&#8243; column_padding=&#8221;2&#8243; title=&#8221;Section III Judgments&#8221; tab_id=&#8221;1555679162900-3-11555679505952d6a2-ca1e&#8221;][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner width=&#8221;2\/3&#8243;][vc_empty_space empty_h=&#8221;1&#8243;][vc_column_text uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;950025&#8243;]JEANTY v. BELGIUM (application no. 82284\/17, judgment of 31 March 2020): detainee who make several attempts to commit suicide, State obligation to provide health care to detainee with suicidal tendency.[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner column_width_percent=&#8221;100&#8243; position_vertical=&#8221;middle&#8221; gutter_size=&#8221;3&#8243; overlay_alpha=&#8221;50&#8243; shift_x=&#8221;0&#8243; shift_y=&#8221;0&#8243; shift_y_down=&#8221;0&#8243; z_index=&#8221;0&#8243; medium_width=&#8221;0&#8243; mobile_width=&#8221;0&#8243; width=&#8221;1\/3&#8243; uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;152120&#8243;][vc_empty_space empty_h=&#8221;1&#8243;][vc_button radius=&#8221;btn-round&#8221; border_width=&#8221;0&#8243; button_color_type=&#8221;uncode-solid&#8221; button_color_solid=&#8221;#0c4f48&#8243; uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;634096&#8243; link=&#8221;url:https%3A%2F%2Fhudoc.echr.coe.int%2Feng%23%7B%2522itemid%2522%3A%5B%2522001-202125%2522%5D%7D|target:_blank&#8221;]Access Decision[\/vc_button][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner width=&#8221;2\/3&#8243;][vc_empty_space empty_h=&#8221;1&#8243;][vc_column_text uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;192697&#8243;]VOVK and BOGDANOV v. RUSSIA (application no. 15613\/10, judgment of 11 February 2020): obligation to criminalise negligent actions and omissions, use of explosive devices by the military.[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner column_width_percent=&#8221;100&#8243; position_vertical=&#8221;middle&#8221; gutter_size=&#8221;3&#8243; overlay_alpha=&#8221;50&#8243; shift_x=&#8221;0&#8243; shift_y=&#8221;0&#8243; shift_y_down=&#8221;0&#8243; z_index=&#8221;0&#8243; medium_width=&#8221;0&#8243; mobile_width=&#8221;0&#8243; width=&#8221;1\/3&#8243; uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;152120&#8243;][vc_empty_space empty_h=&#8221;1&#8243;][vc_button radius=&#8221;btn-round&#8221; border_width=&#8221;0&#8243; button_color_type=&#8221;uncode-solid&#8221; button_color_solid=&#8221;#0c4f48&#8243; uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;712703&#8243; link=&#8221;url:https%3A%2F%2Fhudoc.echr.coe.int%2Feng%23%7B%2522itemid%2522%3A%5B%2522001-200838%2522%5D%7D|target:_blank&#8221;]Access Decision[\/vc_button][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner width=&#8221;2\/3&#8243;][vc_empty_space empty_h=&#8221;1&#8243;][vc_column_text uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;969992&#8243;]ZINATULLIN v. RUSSIA (application no. 10551\/10, judgment of 14 January 2020): victim status before the ECHR regarding substantive violation of article 2, due to insufficient domestic compensation.[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner column_width_percent=&#8221;100&#8243; position_vertical=&#8221;middle&#8221; gutter_size=&#8221;3&#8243; overlay_alpha=&#8221;50&#8243; shift_x=&#8221;0&#8243; shift_y=&#8221;0&#8243; shift_y_down=&#8221;0&#8243; z_index=&#8221;0&#8243; medium_width=&#8221;0&#8243; mobile_width=&#8221;0&#8243; width=&#8221;1\/3&#8243; uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;152120&#8243;][vc_empty_space empty_h=&#8221;1&#8243;][vc_button radius=&#8221;btn-round&#8221; border_width=&#8221;0&#8243; button_color_type=&#8221;uncode-solid&#8221; button_color_solid=&#8221;#0c4f48&#8243; uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;202392&#8243; link=&#8221;url:https%3A%2F%2Fhudoc.echr.coe.int%2Feng%23%7B%2522itemid%2522%3A%5B%2522001-200546%2522%5D%7D|target:_blank&#8221;]Access Decision[\/vc_button][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][\/vc_accordion_tab][vc_accordion_tab gutter_size=&#8221;2&#8243; column_padding=&#8221;2&#8243; title=&#8221;Section IV Judgments&#8221; tab_id=&#8221;1768653103440-4-8&#8243;][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner width=&#8221;2\/3&#8243;][vc_empty_space empty_h=&#8221;1&#8243;][vc_column_text uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;938492&#8243;]MAKUCHYAN AND MINASYAN v. AZERBAIJAN AND HUNGARY (application no. 17247\/13, judgment of 26 May 2020): conviction of Azerbaijani national in Hungary for extremely cruel hate murder of a Armenian national, failure by Hungary to ensure that Azerbaijani national would continue to serve his prison sentence upon transfer to home country, pardon by Azerbaijan president o99f the murderer when he arrived home, Azerbaijan\u2019s acknowledgement and adoption of crime \u201cas its own\u201d.[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner column_width_percent=&#8221;100&#8243; position_vertical=&#8221;middle&#8221; gutter_size=&#8221;3&#8243; overlay_alpha=&#8221;50&#8243; shift_x=&#8221;0&#8243; shift_y=&#8221;0&#8243; shift_y_down=&#8221;0&#8243; z_index=&#8221;0&#8243; medium_width=&#8221;0&#8243; mobile_width=&#8221;0&#8243; width=&#8221;1\/3&#8243; uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;152120&#8243;][vc_empty_space empty_h=&#8221;1&#8243;][vc_button radius=&#8221;btn-round&#8221; border_width=&#8221;0&#8243; button_color_type=&#8221;uncode-solid&#8221; button_color_solid=&#8221;#0c4f48&#8243; uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;190703&#8243; link=&#8221;url:https%3A%2F%2Fhudoc.echr.coe.int%2Feng%23%7B%2522itemid%2522%3A%5B%2522001-202524%2522%5D%7D|target:_blank&#8221;]Access Decision[\/vc_button][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner width=&#8221;2\/3&#8243;][vc_empty_space empty_h=&#8221;1&#8243;][vc_column_text uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;197266&#8243;]MARIUS ALEXANDRU AND MARINELA \u0218TEFAN v. ROMANIA (application no. 78643\/11, judgment of 24 March 2020): traffic accident caused by falling of a rottentree in a public road, State obligation to care for the safety of public roads and trees planted along the roads.[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner column_width_percent=&#8221;100&#8243; position_vertical=&#8221;middle&#8221; gutter_size=&#8221;3&#8243; overlay_alpha=&#8221;50&#8243; shift_x=&#8221;0&#8243; shift_y=&#8221;0&#8243; shift_y_down=&#8221;0&#8243; z_index=&#8221;0&#8243; medium_width=&#8221;0&#8243; mobile_width=&#8221;0&#8243; width=&#8221;1\/3&#8243; uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;152120&#8243;][vc_empty_space empty_h=&#8221;1&#8243;][vc_button radius=&#8221;btn-round&#8221; border_width=&#8221;0&#8243; button_color_type=&#8221;uncode-solid&#8221; button_color_solid=&#8221;#0c4f48&#8243; uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;174153&#8243; link=&#8221;url:https%3A%2F%2Fhudoc.echr.coe.int%2Feng%23%7B%2522itemid%2522%3A%5B%2522002-12776%2522%5D%7D&#8221;]Access Decision[\/vc_button][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner width=&#8221;2\/3&#8243;][vc_empty_space empty_h=&#8221;1&#8243;][vc_column_text uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;208422&#8243;]AKELIEN\u0116 v. LITHUANIA (application no. 54917\/13, judgment of 16 October 2018): failure to enforce a custodial sentence imposed on a fugitive double murderer, drawing arguments to the Government\u2019s benefit from incomplete or insufficient sources, fallacy of ignorance (argumentum ad ignorantiam), treatment of classified documents.[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner column_width_percent=&#8221;100&#8243; position_vertical=&#8221;middle&#8221; gutter_size=&#8221;3&#8243; overlay_alpha=&#8221;50&#8243; shift_x=&#8221;0&#8243; shift_y=&#8221;0&#8243; shift_y_down=&#8221;0&#8243; z_index=&#8221;0&#8243; medium_width=&#8221;0&#8243; mobile_width=&#8221;0&#8243; width=&#8221;1\/3&#8243; uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;152120&#8243;][vc_empty_space empty_h=&#8221;1&#8243;][vc_button radius=&#8221;btn-round&#8221; border_width=&#8221;0&#8243; button_color_type=&#8221;uncode-solid&#8221; button_color_solid=&#8221;#0c4f48&#8243; uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;195860&#8243; link=&#8221;url:https%3A%2F%2Fhudoc.echr.coe.int%2Feng%23%7B%2522itemid%2522%3A%5B%2522001-186768%2522%5D%7D|target:_blank&#8221;]Access Decision[\/vc_button][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][\/vc_accordion_tab][\/vc_accordion][\/vc_column][\/vc_row]<\/p>\n<\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>[vc_row unlock_row_content=&#8221;yes&#8221; row_height_percent=&#8221;0&#8243; override_padding=&#8221;yes&#8221; h_padding=&#8221;7&#8243; top_padding=&#8221;7&#8243; bottom_padding=&#8221;7&#8243; back_image=&#8221;166597&#8243; back_position=&#8221;center center&#8221; overlay_alpha=&#8221;50&#8243; overlay_color_blend=&#8221;multiply&#8221; gutter_size=&#8221;3&#8243; column_width_percent=&#8221;100&#8243; shift_y=&#8221;0&#8243; z_index=&#8221;0&#8243; bottom_divider=&#8221;gradient&#8221; css_animation=&#8221;scroll-trigger&#8221; animation_state=&#8221;end&#8221; animation_origin=&#8221;center&#8221; [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":166607,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-166708","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/dev.creativewalkers.com\/pa\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/166708","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/dev.creativewalkers.com\/pa\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/dev.creativewalkers.com\/pa\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dev.creativewalkers.com\/pa\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dev.creativewalkers.com\/pa\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=166708"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/dev.creativewalkers.com\/pa\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/166708\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":167184,"href":"https:\/\/dev.creativewalkers.com\/pa\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/166708\/revisions\/167184"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dev.creativewalkers.com\/pa\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/166607"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/dev.creativewalkers.com\/pa\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=166708"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}