{"id":167002,"date":"2026-02-09T11:10:36","date_gmt":"2026-02-09T11:10:36","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/dev.creativewalkers.com\/pa\/?page_id=167002"},"modified":"2026-02-23T13:06:44","modified_gmt":"2026-02-23T13:06:44","slug":"the-right-to-protection-of-private-and-family-life","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/dev.creativewalkers.com\/pa\/adjudication\/the-right-to-protection-of-private-and-family-life\/","title":{"rendered":"The Right to protection of private and family life"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"wpb-content-wrapper\"><p>[vc_row unlock_row_content=&#8221;yes&#8221; row_height_percent=&#8221;0&#8243; override_padding=&#8221;yes&#8221; h_padding=&#8221;7&#8243; top_padding=&#8221;7&#8243; bottom_padding=&#8221;7&#8243; back_image=&#8221;166597&#8243; back_position=&#8221;center center&#8221; overlay_alpha=&#8221;50&#8243; overlay_color_blend=&#8221;multiply&#8221; gutter_size=&#8221;3&#8243; column_width_percent=&#8221;100&#8243; shift_y=&#8221;0&#8243; z_index=&#8221;0&#8243; bottom_divider=&#8221;gradient&#8221; css_animation=&#8221;scroll-trigger&#8221; animation_state=&#8221;end&#8221; animation_origin=&#8221;center&#8221; animation_scale_val=&#8221;100&#8243; animation_opacity=&#8221;0&#8243; animation_x=&#8221;0&#8243; animation_y=&#8221;0&#8243; animation_blur=&#8221;0&#8243; animation_rotate=&#8221;0&#8243; animation_perspective=&#8221;0&#8243; animation_offset_top=&#8221;0&#8243; animation_offset_bottom=&#8221;85&#8243; content_parallax=&#8221;3&#8243; uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;309354&#8243; back_color_type=&#8221;uncode-solid&#8221; overlay_color_type=&#8221;uncode-solid&#8221; overlay_color_solid=&#8221;#0c4f48&#8243; back_color_solid=&#8221;#0c4f48&#8243;][vc_column column_width_percent=&#8221;100&#8243; position_vertical=&#8221;bottom&#8221; gutter_size=&#8221;4&#8243; style=&#8221;dark&#8221; overlay_alpha=&#8221;50&#8243; shift_x=&#8221;0&#8243; shift_y=&#8221;0&#8243; shift_y_down=&#8221;0&#8243; z_index=&#8221;0&#8243; medium_width=&#8221;0&#8243; mobile_width=&#8221;0&#8243; width=&#8221;1\/1&#8243; uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;171104&#8243;][vc_row_inner limit_content=&#8221;&#8221;][vc_column_inner column_width_percent=&#8221;100&#8243; position_horizontal=&#8221;left&#8221; gutter_size=&#8221;3&#8243; style=&#8221;dark&#8221; overlay_alpha=&#8221;50&#8243; shift_x=&#8221;0&#8243; shift_y=&#8221;0&#8243; shift_y_down=&#8221;0&#8243; z_index=&#8221;0&#8243; medium_width=&#8221;0&#8243; mobile_width=&#8221;0&#8243; width=&#8221;9\/12&#8243; uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;311432&#8243;][vc_custom_heading heading_semantic=&#8221;h3&#8243; text_font=&#8221;font-161747&#8243; text_size=&#8221;custom&#8221; text_weight=&#8221;300&#8243; text_space=&#8221;fontspace-111509&#8243; uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;167084&#8243; heading_custom_size=&#8221;clamp(50px,7vw,125px)&#8221;]Adjudication[\/vc_custom_heading][vc_custom_heading text_color=&#8221;color-xsdn&#8221; heading_semantic=&#8221;h6&#8243; uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;547314&#8243; text_color_type=&#8221;uncode-palette&#8221;]THE RIGHT TO PROTECTION OF PRIVATE AND FAMILY LIFE[\/vc_custom_heading][\/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner column_width_percent=&#8221;100&#8243; gutter_size=&#8221;3&#8243; overlay_alpha=&#8221;50&#8243; shift_x=&#8221;0&#8243; shift_y=&#8221;0&#8243; shift_y_down=&#8221;0&#8243; z_index=&#8221;0&#8243; medium_visibility=&#8221;yes&#8221; medium_width=&#8221;0&#8243; mobile_visibility=&#8221;yes&#8221; mobile_width=&#8221;0&#8243; width=&#8221;3\/12&#8243; uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;100417&#8243;][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row unlock_row_content=&#8221;yes&#8221; row_height_percent=&#8221;0&#8243; override_padding=&#8221;yes&#8221; h_padding=&#8221;2&#8243; top_padding=&#8221;2&#8243; bottom_padding=&#8221;2&#8243; back_color=&#8221;color-xsdn&#8221; overlay_alpha=&#8221;50&#8243; gutter_size=&#8221;3&#8243; column_width_percent=&#8221;100&#8243; shift_y=&#8221;0&#8243; z_index=&#8221;0&#8243; content_parallax=&#8221;0&#8243; uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;111866&#8243; back_color_type=&#8221;uncode-palette&#8221;][vc_column column_width_percent=&#8221;100&#8243; gutter_size=&#8221;4&#8243; override_padding=&#8221;yes&#8221; column_padding=&#8221;5&#8243; back_color=&#8221;color-xsdn&#8221; overlay_alpha=&#8221;50&#8243; radius=&#8221;std&#8221; shift_x=&#8221;0&#8243; shift_y=&#8221;0&#8243; shift_y_down=&#8221;0&#8243; z_index=&#8221;0&#8243; medium_width=&#8221;0&#8243; mobile_width=&#8221;0&#8243; width=&#8221;1\/1&#8243; uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;868186&#8243; back_color_type=&#8221;uncode-palette&#8221;][vc_accordion no_toggle=&#8221;yes&#8221; gutter_simple=&#8221;0&#8243; active_tab=&#8221;0&#8243; uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;291747&#8243;][vc_accordion_tab gutter_size=&#8221;2&#8243; column_padding=&#8221;2&#8243; title=&#8221;Grand Chamber Judgments&#8221; tab_id=&#8221;d21d5937-3bb0-215556789140011555679505952d6a2-ca1e&#8221;][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner width=&#8221;2\/3&#8243;][vc_empty_space empty_h=&#8221;1&#8243;][vc_column_text uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;121006&#8243;]BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM (applications nos. 58170\/13, 62322\/14 and 24960\/15,\u00a0 judgment of 25 May 2021): Convention compliance of the British secret surveillance regime including bulk interception of communications and intelligence sharing.[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner column_width_percent=&#8221;100&#8243; position_vertical=&#8221;middle&#8221; gutter_size=&#8221;3&#8243; overlay_alpha=&#8221;50&#8243; shift_x=&#8221;0&#8243; shift_y=&#8221;0&#8243; shift_y_down=&#8221;0&#8243; z_index=&#8221;0&#8243; medium_width=&#8221;0&#8243; mobile_width=&#8221;0&#8243; width=&#8221;1\/3&#8243; uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;152120&#8243;][vc_empty_space empty_h=&#8221;1&#8243;][vc_button radius=&#8221;btn-round&#8221; border_width=&#8221;0&#8243; button_color_type=&#8221;uncode-solid&#8221; button_color_solid=&#8221;#0c4f48&#8243; uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;887691&#8243; link=&#8221;url:https%3A%2F%2Fhudoc.echr.coe.int%2Feng%23%7B%2522itemid%2522%3A%5B%2522002-12080%2522%5D%7D|target:_blank&#8221;]Access Decision[\/vc_button][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner width=&#8221;2\/3&#8243;][vc_empty_space empty_h=&#8221;1&#8243;][vc_column_text uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;603075&#8243;]CENTRUM F\u00d6R R\u00c4TTVISA v. SWEDEN (application no. 35252\/08, judgment of 25 May 2021): Convention compliance of the Swedish secret surveillance regime including bulk interception of communications and intelligence sharing.[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner column_width_percent=&#8221;100&#8243; position_vertical=&#8221;middle&#8221; gutter_size=&#8221;3&#8243; overlay_alpha=&#8221;50&#8243; shift_x=&#8221;0&#8243; shift_y=&#8221;0&#8243; shift_y_down=&#8221;0&#8243; z_index=&#8221;0&#8243; medium_width=&#8221;0&#8243; mobile_width=&#8221;0&#8243; width=&#8221;1\/3&#8243; uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;152120&#8243;][vc_empty_space empty_h=&#8221;1&#8243;][vc_button radius=&#8221;btn-round&#8221; border_width=&#8221;0&#8243; button_color_type=&#8221;uncode-solid&#8221; button_color_solid=&#8221;#0c4f48&#8243; uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;134209&#8243; link=&#8221;url:https%3A%2F%2Fhudoc.echr.coe.int%2Feng%23%7B%2522itemid%2522%3A%5B%2522001-210078%2522%5D%7D|target:_blank&#8221;]Access Decision[\/vc_button][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner width=&#8221;2\/3&#8243;][vc_empty_space empty_h=&#8221;1&#8243;][vc_column_text uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;378961&#8243;]PARADISO AND CAMPANELLI v. ITALY (application no. 25358\/12, judgment of 24 January 2017): prohibition of remunerated gestational surrogacy.[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner column_width_percent=&#8221;100&#8243; position_vertical=&#8221;middle&#8221; gutter_size=&#8221;3&#8243; overlay_alpha=&#8221;50&#8243; shift_x=&#8221;0&#8243; shift_y=&#8221;0&#8243; shift_y_down=&#8221;0&#8243; z_index=&#8221;0&#8243; medium_width=&#8221;0&#8243; mobile_width=&#8221;0&#8243; width=&#8221;1\/3&#8243; uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;152120&#8243;][vc_empty_space empty_h=&#8221;1&#8243;][vc_button radius=&#8221;btn-round&#8221; border_width=&#8221;0&#8243; button_color_type=&#8221;uncode-solid&#8221; button_color_solid=&#8221;#0c4f48&#8243; uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;896617&#8243; link=&#8221;url:https%3A%2F%2Fhudoc.echr.coe.int%2Ffre%23%7B%2522itemid%2522%3A%5B%2522001-170359%2522%5D%7D|target:_blank&#8221;]Access Decision[\/vc_button][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner width=&#8221;2\/3&#8243;][vc_empty_space empty_h=&#8221;1&#8243;][vc_column_text uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;454653&#8243;]PARRILLO v. ITALY (application no. 46470\/11, judgment of 27 August 2015): scientific research on human embryos and embryonic stem cells.[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner column_width_percent=&#8221;100&#8243; position_vertical=&#8221;middle&#8221; gutter_size=&#8221;3&#8243; overlay_alpha=&#8221;50&#8243; shift_x=&#8221;0&#8243; shift_y=&#8221;0&#8243; shift_y_down=&#8221;0&#8243; z_index=&#8221;0&#8243; medium_width=&#8221;0&#8243; mobile_width=&#8221;0&#8243; width=&#8221;1\/3&#8243; uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;152120&#8243;][vc_empty_space empty_h=&#8221;1&#8243;][vc_button radius=&#8221;btn-round&#8221; border_width=&#8221;0&#8243; button_color_type=&#8221;uncode-solid&#8221; button_color_solid=&#8221;#0c4f48&#8243; uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;584032&#8243; link=&#8221;url:https%3A%2F%2Fhudoc.echr.coe.int%2Feng%23%7B%2522itemid%2522%3A%5B%2522001-157263%2522%5D%7D|target:_blank&#8221;]Access Decision[\/vc_button][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner width=&#8221;2\/3&#8243;][vc_empty_space empty_h=&#8221;1&#8243;][vc_column_text uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;137184&#8243;]KHOROSHENKO v. RUSSIA (application no. 41418\/04, judgment of 30 June 2015): prisoner\u2019s right to family visits, resocialisation as the primary purpose of imprisonment, the State obligation to provide for an individualised sentence plan.[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner column_width_percent=&#8221;100&#8243; position_vertical=&#8221;middle&#8221; gutter_size=&#8221;3&#8243; overlay_alpha=&#8221;50&#8243; shift_x=&#8221;0&#8243; shift_y=&#8221;0&#8243; shift_y_down=&#8221;0&#8243; z_index=&#8221;0&#8243; medium_width=&#8221;0&#8243; mobile_width=&#8221;0&#8243; width=&#8221;1\/3&#8243; uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;152120&#8243;][vc_empty_space empty_h=&#8221;1&#8243;][vc_button radius=&#8221;btn-round&#8221; border_width=&#8221;0&#8243; button_color_type=&#8221;uncode-solid&#8221; button_color_solid=&#8221;#0c4f48&#8243; uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;644960&#8243; link=&#8221;url:https%3A%2F%2Fhudoc.echr.coe.int%2Feng%23%7B%2522itemid%2522%3A%5B%2522001-156006%2522%5D%7D|target:_blank&#8221;]Access Decision[\/vc_button][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner width=&#8221;2\/3&#8243;][vc_empty_space empty_h=&#8221;1&#8243;][vc_column_text uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;544517&#8243;]X. v. LATVIA (application no. 27853\/09, judgment of 26 November 2013): the conflict between obligations derived from European Convention on Human Rights and the obligations derived from the Hague Convention on international child abduction, the \u201cinchoate\u201d custody right of a non-registered father[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner column_width_percent=&#8221;100&#8243; position_vertical=&#8221;middle&#8221; gutter_size=&#8221;3&#8243; overlay_alpha=&#8221;50&#8243; shift_x=&#8221;0&#8243; shift_y=&#8221;0&#8243; shift_y_down=&#8221;0&#8243; z_index=&#8221;0&#8243; medium_width=&#8221;0&#8243; mobile_width=&#8221;0&#8243; width=&#8221;1\/3&#8243; uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;152120&#8243;][vc_empty_space empty_h=&#8221;1&#8243;][vc_button radius=&#8221;btn-round&#8221; border_width=&#8221;0&#8243; button_color_type=&#8221;uncode-solid&#8221; button_color_solid=&#8221;#0c4f48&#8243; uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;110560&#8243; link=&#8221;url:https%3A%2F%2Fhudoc.echr.coe.int%2Ffre%23%7B%2522itemid%2522%3A%5B%2522002-9245%2522%5D%7D|target:_blank&#8221;]Access Decision[\/vc_button][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner width=&#8221;2\/3&#8243;][vc_empty_space empty_h=&#8221;1&#8243;][vc_column_text uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;368787&#8243;]S\u00d6DERMAN v. SWEDEN (application no. 5786\/08, judgment of 12 November 2013): the State obligation to criminalise child pornography, evolutive interpretation of penal law in accordance with the international law obligations of the State, right to domestic compensation based directly on a violation of the Convention, even in the absence of a violation of national law.[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner column_width_percent=&#8221;100&#8243; position_vertical=&#8221;middle&#8221; gutter_size=&#8221;3&#8243; overlay_alpha=&#8221;50&#8243; shift_x=&#8221;0&#8243; shift_y=&#8221;0&#8243; shift_y_down=&#8221;0&#8243; z_index=&#8221;0&#8243; medium_width=&#8221;0&#8243; mobile_width=&#8221;0&#8243; width=&#8221;1\/3&#8243; uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;152120&#8243;][vc_empty_space empty_h=&#8221;1&#8243;][vc_button radius=&#8221;btn-round&#8221; border_width=&#8221;0&#8243; button_color_type=&#8221;uncode-solid&#8221; button_color_solid=&#8221;#0c4f48&#8243; uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;153351&#8243; link=&#8221;url:https%3A%2F%2Fhudoc.echr.coe.int%2Ffre%23%7B%2522itemid%2522%3A%5B%2522001-128043%2522%5D%7D|target:_blank&#8221;]Access Decision[\/vc_button][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][\/vc_accordion_tab][vc_accordion_tab gutter_size=&#8221;2&#8243; column_padding=&#8221;2&#8243; title=&#8221;Section I Judgments&#8221; tab_id=&#8221;6dad8f3c-7309-815556789140011555679505952d6a2-ca1e&#8221;][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner width=&#8221;2\/3&#8243;][vc_empty_space empty_h=&#8221;1&#8243;][vc_column_text uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;300008&#8243;]S\u00d5RO v. ESTONIA (application no. 22588\/08, judgment of 3 September 2015): registration and public disclosure of former KGB employee as a lustration measure.[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner column_width_percent=&#8221;100&#8243; position_vertical=&#8221;middle&#8221; gutter_size=&#8221;3&#8243; overlay_alpha=&#8221;50&#8243; shift_x=&#8221;0&#8243; shift_y=&#8221;0&#8243; shift_y_down=&#8221;0&#8243; z_index=&#8221;0&#8243; medium_width=&#8221;0&#8243; mobile_width=&#8221;0&#8243; width=&#8221;1\/3&#8243; uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;152120&#8243;][vc_empty_space empty_h=&#8221;1&#8243;][vc_button radius=&#8221;btn-round&#8221; border_width=&#8221;0&#8243; button_color_type=&#8221;uncode-solid&#8221; button_color_solid=&#8221;#0c4f48&#8243; uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;166999&#8243; link=&#8221;url:https%3A%2F%2Fhudoc.echr.coe.int%2Feng%23%7B%2522itemid%2522%3A%5B%2522001-156518%2522%5D%7D|target:_blank&#8221;]Access Decision[\/vc_button][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner width=&#8221;2\/3&#8243;][vc_empty_space empty_h=&#8221;1&#8243;][vc_column_text uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;122171&#8243;]MARINIS v. GREECE (application no. 3004\/10, judgment of 9 October 2014): the principle of prevalence of biological link in paternity and maternity actions.[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner column_width_percent=&#8221;100&#8243; position_vertical=&#8221;middle&#8221; gutter_size=&#8221;3&#8243; overlay_alpha=&#8221;50&#8243; shift_x=&#8221;0&#8243; shift_y=&#8221;0&#8243; shift_y_down=&#8221;0&#8243; z_index=&#8221;0&#8243; medium_width=&#8221;0&#8243; mobile_width=&#8221;0&#8243; width=&#8221;1\/3&#8243; uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;152120&#8243;][vc_empty_space empty_h=&#8221;1&#8243;][vc_button radius=&#8221;btn-round&#8221; border_width=&#8221;0&#8243; button_color_type=&#8221;uncode-solid&#8221; button_color_solid=&#8221;#0c4f48&#8243; uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;984787&#8243; link=&#8221;url:https%3A%2F%2Fhudoc.echr.coe.int%2Feng%23%7B%2522itemid%2522%3A%5B%2522001-146776%2522%5D%7D|target:_blank&#8221;]Access Decision[\/vc_button][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][\/vc_accordion_tab][vc_accordion_tab gutter_size=&#8221;2&#8243; column_padding=&#8221;2&#8243; title=&#8221;Section II Judgments&#8221; tab_id=&#8221;9346230d-a835-915556789140011555679505952d6a2-ca1e&#8221;][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner width=&#8221;2\/3&#8243;][vc_empty_space empty_h=&#8221;1&#8243;][vc_column_text uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;172227&#8243;]VASQUEZ v. SWITZERLAND (application no. 1785\/08, judgment of 26 November 2013): administrative expulsion of foreigner convicted of a sexual crime, although criminal court suspended expulsion, presumption of danger for public security based on decisions of dismissal of criminal proceedings.[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner column_width_percent=&#8221;100&#8243; position_vertical=&#8221;middle&#8221; gutter_size=&#8221;3&#8243; overlay_alpha=&#8221;50&#8243; shift_x=&#8221;0&#8243; shift_y=&#8221;0&#8243; shift_y_down=&#8221;0&#8243; z_index=&#8221;0&#8243; medium_width=&#8221;0&#8243; mobile_width=&#8221;0&#8243; width=&#8221;1\/3&#8243; uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;152120&#8243;][vc_empty_space empty_h=&#8221;1&#8243;][vc_button radius=&#8221;btn-round&#8221; border_width=&#8221;0&#8243; button_color_type=&#8221;uncode-solid&#8221; button_color_solid=&#8221;#0c4f48&#8243; uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;133715&#8243; link=&#8221;url:https%3A%2F%2Fhudoc.echr.coe.int%2Feng%23%7B%2522itemid%2522%3A%5B%2522001-138562%2522%5D%7D|target:_blank&#8221;]Access Decision[\/vc_button][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner width=&#8221;2\/3&#8243;][vc_empty_space empty_h=&#8221;1&#8243;][vc_column_text uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;105526&#8243;]KISSIWA KOFFI v. SWITZERLAND (application no. 38005\/07, judgment of 15 November 2012): expulsion of a foreign citizen convicted of a crime of drug trafficking.[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner column_width_percent=&#8221;100&#8243; position_vertical=&#8221;middle&#8221; gutter_size=&#8221;3&#8243; overlay_alpha=&#8221;50&#8243; shift_x=&#8221;0&#8243; shift_y=&#8221;0&#8243; shift_y_down=&#8221;0&#8243; z_index=&#8221;0&#8243; medium_width=&#8221;0&#8243; mobile_width=&#8221;0&#8243; width=&#8221;1\/3&#8243; uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;152120&#8243;][vc_empty_space empty_h=&#8221;1&#8243;][vc_button radius=&#8221;btn-round&#8221; border_width=&#8221;0&#8243; button_color_type=&#8221;uncode-solid&#8221; button_color_solid=&#8221;#0c4f48&#8243; uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;883685&#8243; link=&#8221;url:https%3A%2F%2Fhudoc.echr.coe.int%2Feng%23%7B%2522itemid%2522%3A%5B%2522001-114461%2522%5D%7D|target:_blank&#8221;]Access Decision[\/vc_button][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner width=&#8221;2\/3&#8243;][vc_empty_space empty_h=&#8221;1&#8243;][vc_column_text uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;178577&#8243;]SHALA v. SWITZERLAND (application no. 52873\/09, judgment of 15 November 2012): expulsion of a foreign citizen convicted of several crimes of minor gravity.[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner column_width_percent=&#8221;100&#8243; position_vertical=&#8221;middle&#8221; gutter_size=&#8221;3&#8243; overlay_alpha=&#8221;50&#8243; shift_x=&#8221;0&#8243; shift_y=&#8221;0&#8243; shift_y_down=&#8221;0&#8243; z_index=&#8221;0&#8243; medium_width=&#8221;0&#8243; mobile_width=&#8221;0&#8243; width=&#8221;1\/3&#8243; uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;152120&#8243;][vc_empty_space empty_h=&#8221;1&#8243;][vc_button radius=&#8221;btn-round&#8221; border_width=&#8221;0&#8243; button_color_type=&#8221;uncode-solid&#8221; button_color_solid=&#8221;#0c4f48&#8243; uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;394334&#8243; link=&#8221;url:https%3A%2F%2Fhudoc.echr.coe.int%2Feng-press%23%7B%2522itemid%2522%3A%5B%2522003-6468357-8521728%2522%5D%7D|target:_blank&#8221;]Access Decision[\/vc_button][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner width=&#8221;2\/3&#8243;][vc_empty_space empty_h=&#8221;1&#8243;][vc_column_text uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;364587&#8243;]PONTES v. PORTUGAL (application no. 19554\/09, judgment of 10 April 2012): court order for a child to be placed for adoption due to drug addiction of parents.[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner column_width_percent=&#8221;100&#8243; position_vertical=&#8221;middle&#8221; gutter_size=&#8221;3&#8243; overlay_alpha=&#8221;50&#8243; shift_x=&#8221;0&#8243; shift_y=&#8221;0&#8243; shift_y_down=&#8221;0&#8243; z_index=&#8221;0&#8243; medium_width=&#8221;0&#8243; mobile_width=&#8221;0&#8243; width=&#8221;1\/3&#8243; uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;152120&#8243;][vc_empty_space empty_h=&#8221;1&#8243;][vc_button radius=&#8221;btn-round&#8221; border_width=&#8221;0&#8243; button_color_type=&#8221;uncode-solid&#8221; button_color_solid=&#8221;#0c4f48&#8243; uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;197303&#8243; link=&#8221;url:https%3A%2F%2Fhudoc.echr.coe.int%2Feng%23%7B%2522itemid%2522%3A%5B%2522001-110269%2522%5D%7D|target:_blank&#8221;]Access Decision[\/vc_button][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner width=&#8221;2\/3&#8243;][vc_empty_space empty_h=&#8221;1&#8243;][vc_column_text uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;182857&#8243;]ASSUN\u00c7\u00c3O CHAVES v. PORTUGAL (application no. 61226\/08, judgment of 31 January 2012): court order for a child to be placed for adoption due to negligent behaviour of parents.[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner column_width_percent=&#8221;100&#8243; position_vertical=&#8221;middle&#8221; gutter_size=&#8221;3&#8243; overlay_alpha=&#8221;50&#8243; shift_x=&#8221;0&#8243; shift_y=&#8221;0&#8243; shift_y_down=&#8221;0&#8243; z_index=&#8221;0&#8243; medium_width=&#8221;0&#8243; mobile_width=&#8221;0&#8243; width=&#8221;1\/3&#8243; uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;152120&#8243;][vc_empty_space empty_h=&#8221;1&#8243;][vc_button radius=&#8221;btn-round&#8221; border_width=&#8221;0&#8243; button_color_type=&#8221;uncode-solid&#8221; button_color_solid=&#8221;#0c4f48&#8243; uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;135999&#8243; link=&#8221;url:https%3A%2F%2Fhudoc.echr.coe.int%2Ffre%23%7B%2522itemid%2522%3A%5B%2522001-108838%2522%5D%7D|target:_blank&#8221;]Access Decision[\/vc_button][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner width=&#8221;2\/3&#8243;][vc_empty_space empty_h=&#8221;1&#8243;][vc_column_text uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;159800&#8243;]VARAPNICKAITE-MAZYLIENE v. LITHUANIA (application no. 20376\/05, judgment of 17 January 2012): public disclosure of medical data.[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner column_width_percent=&#8221;100&#8243; position_vertical=&#8221;middle&#8221; gutter_size=&#8221;3&#8243; overlay_alpha=&#8221;50&#8243; shift_x=&#8221;0&#8243; shift_y=&#8221;0&#8243; shift_y_down=&#8221;0&#8243; z_index=&#8221;0&#8243; medium_width=&#8221;0&#8243; mobile_width=&#8221;0&#8243; width=&#8221;1\/3&#8243; uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;152120&#8243;][vc_empty_space empty_h=&#8221;1&#8243;][vc_button radius=&#8221;btn-round&#8221; border_width=&#8221;0&#8243; button_color_type=&#8221;uncode-solid&#8221; button_color_solid=&#8221;#0c4f48&#8243; uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;365349&#8243; link=&#8221;url:https%3A%2F%2Fhudoc.echr.coe.int%2Feng%23%7B%2522itemid%2522%3A%5B%2522001-108680%2522%5D%7D|target:_blank&#8221;]Access Decision[\/vc_button][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner width=&#8221;2\/3&#8243;][vc_empty_space empty_h=&#8221;1&#8243;][vc_column_text uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;167035&#8243;]IYILIK v. TURKEY (application no. 2899\/05, judgment of 6 December 2011): paternity presumption of the mother\u2019s spouse.[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner column_width_percent=&#8221;100&#8243; position_vertical=&#8221;middle&#8221; gutter_size=&#8221;3&#8243; overlay_alpha=&#8221;50&#8243; shift_x=&#8221;0&#8243; shift_y=&#8221;0&#8243; shift_y_down=&#8221;0&#8243; z_index=&#8221;0&#8243; medium_width=&#8221;0&#8243; mobile_width=&#8221;0&#8243; width=&#8221;1\/3&#8243; uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;152120&#8243;][vc_empty_space empty_h=&#8221;1&#8243;][vc_button radius=&#8221;btn-round&#8221; border_width=&#8221;0&#8243; button_color_type=&#8221;uncode-solid&#8221; button_color_solid=&#8221;#0c4f48&#8243; uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;129899&#8243; link=&#8221;url:https%3A%2F%2Fhudoc.echr.coe.int%2F%23%7B%2522itemid%2522%3A%5B%2522001-107729%2522%5D%7D|target:_blank&#8221;]Access Decision[\/vc_button][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][\/vc_accordion_tab][vc_accordion_tab gutter_size=&#8221;2&#8243; column_padding=&#8221;2&#8243; title=&#8221;Section III Judgments&#8221; tab_id=&#8221;1555679162900-3-11555679505952d6a2-ca1e&#8221;][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner width=&#8221;2\/3&#8243;][vc_empty_space empty_h=&#8221;1&#8243;][vc_column_text uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;144132&#8243;]ZAKHARCHUK v. RUSSIA (application no. 2967\/12, judgment of 17 December 2019): expulsion of foreign, young citizen convicted of grievous bodily harm.[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner column_width_percent=&#8221;100&#8243; position_vertical=&#8221;middle&#8221; gutter_size=&#8221;3&#8243; overlay_alpha=&#8221;50&#8243; shift_x=&#8221;0&#8243; shift_y=&#8221;0&#8243; shift_y_down=&#8221;0&#8243; z_index=&#8221;0&#8243; medium_width=&#8221;0&#8243; mobile_width=&#8221;0&#8243; width=&#8221;1\/3&#8243; uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;152120&#8243;][vc_empty_space empty_h=&#8221;1&#8243;][vc_button radius=&#8221;btn-round&#8221; border_width=&#8221;0&#8243; button_color_type=&#8221;uncode-solid&#8221; button_color_solid=&#8221;#0c4f48&#8243; uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;154040&#8243; link=&#8221;url:https%3A%2F%2Fhudoc.echr.coe.int%2Feng%23%7B%2522itemid%2522%3A%5B%2522001-199174%2522%5D%7D|target:_blank&#8221;]Access Decision[\/vc_button][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][\/vc_accordion_tab][vc_accordion_tab gutter_size=&#8221;2&#8243; column_padding=&#8221;2&#8243; title=&#8221;Section IV Judgments&#8221; tab_id=&#8221;1768653103440-4-8&#8243;][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner width=&#8221;2\/3&#8243;][vc_empty_space empty_h=&#8221;1&#8243;][vc_column_text uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;195021&#8243;]BABIARZ v. POLAND (application no. 1955\/10, judgment of 10 January2017): right to divorce, the protection of de facto f amily life created by one of the spouses with another third person, unpredictable case law)[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner column_width_percent=&#8221;100&#8243; position_vertical=&#8221;middle&#8221; gutter_size=&#8221;3&#8243; overlay_alpha=&#8221;50&#8243; shift_x=&#8221;0&#8243; shift_y=&#8221;0&#8243; shift_y_down=&#8221;0&#8243; z_index=&#8221;0&#8243; medium_width=&#8221;0&#8243; mobile_width=&#8221;0&#8243; width=&#8221;1\/3&#8243; uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;152120&#8243;][vc_empty_space empty_h=&#8221;1&#8243;][vc_button radius=&#8221;btn-round&#8221; border_width=&#8221;0&#8243; button_color_type=&#8221;uncode-solid&#8221; button_color_solid=&#8221;#0c4f48&#8243; uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;176491&#8243; link=&#8221;url:https%3A%2F%2Fhudoc.echr.coe.int%2Feng%23%7B%2522itemid%2522%3A%5B%2522001-170344%2522%5D%7D|target:_blank&#8221;]Access Decision[\/vc_button][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner width=&#8221;2\/3&#8243;][vc_empty_space empty_h=&#8221;1&#8243;][vc_column_text uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;773045&#8243;]RAMADAN v. MALTA (application no. 76136\/12, judgment of 21 June 2016): right to citizenship, prohibition of statelessness, revocation of citizenship due to annulment of false marriage.[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner column_width_percent=&#8221;100&#8243; position_vertical=&#8221;middle&#8221; gutter_size=&#8221;3&#8243; overlay_alpha=&#8221;50&#8243; shift_x=&#8221;0&#8243; shift_y=&#8221;0&#8243; shift_y_down=&#8221;0&#8243; z_index=&#8221;0&#8243; medium_width=&#8221;0&#8243; mobile_width=&#8221;0&#8243; width=&#8221;1\/3&#8243; uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;152120&#8243;][vc_empty_space empty_h=&#8221;1&#8243;][vc_button radius=&#8221;btn-round&#8221; border_width=&#8221;0&#8243; button_color_type=&#8221;uncode-solid&#8221; button_color_solid=&#8221;#0c4f48&#8243; uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;129230&#8243; link=&#8221;url:https%3A%2F%2Fhudoc.echr.coe.int%2Feng%23%7B%2522itemid%2522%3A%5B%2522001-163820%2522%5D%7D&#8221;]Access Decision[\/vc_button][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner width=&#8221;2\/3&#8243;][vc_empty_space empty_h=&#8221;1&#8243;][vc_column_text uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;184693&#8243;]SZABO AND VISSY v. HUNGARY (application no. 37138\/14, judgment of 12 January 2016): mass surveillance for the purpose of national security.[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner column_width_percent=&#8221;100&#8243; position_vertical=&#8221;middle&#8221; gutter_size=&#8221;3&#8243; overlay_alpha=&#8221;50&#8243; shift_x=&#8221;0&#8243; shift_y=&#8221;0&#8243; shift_y_down=&#8221;0&#8243; z_index=&#8221;0&#8243; medium_width=&#8221;0&#8243; mobile_width=&#8221;0&#8243; width=&#8221;1\/3&#8243; uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;152120&#8243;][vc_empty_space empty_h=&#8221;1&#8243;][vc_button radius=&#8221;btn-round&#8221; border_width=&#8221;0&#8243; button_color_type=&#8221;uncode-solid&#8221; button_color_solid=&#8221;#0c4f48&#8243; uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;149307&#8243; link=&#8221;url:https%3A%2F%2Fhudoc.echr.coe.int%2Ffre%23%7B%2522itemid%2522%3A%5B%2522001-160020%2522%5D%7D|target:_blank&#8221;]Access Decision[\/vc_button][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner width=&#8221;2\/3&#8243;][vc_empty_space empty_h=&#8221;1&#8243;][vc_column_text uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;198038&#8243;]BARBULESCU v. ROMANIA (application no. no. 61496\/08, judgment of 12January 2016): employer\u2019s surveillance of the employee\u2019s Internet usage in the workplace within a private employment relation, termination of employment relation on the basis of the employee\u2019s intercepted Internet messages, horizontal effect of the European Convention.[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner column_width_percent=&#8221;100&#8243; position_vertical=&#8221;middle&#8221; gutter_size=&#8221;3&#8243; overlay_alpha=&#8221;50&#8243; shift_x=&#8221;0&#8243; shift_y=&#8221;0&#8243; shift_y_down=&#8221;0&#8243; z_index=&#8221;0&#8243; medium_width=&#8221;0&#8243; mobile_width=&#8221;0&#8243; width=&#8221;1\/3&#8243; uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;152120&#8243;][vc_empty_space empty_h=&#8221;1&#8243;][vc_button radius=&#8221;btn-round&#8221; border_width=&#8221;0&#8243; button_color_type=&#8221;uncode-solid&#8221; button_color_solid=&#8221;#0c4f48&#8243; uncode_shortcode_id=&#8221;184963&#8243; link=&#8221;url:https%3A%2F%2Fhudoc.echr.coe.int%2Feng%23%7B%2522itemid%2522%3A%5B%2522001-159906%2522%5D%7D|target:_blank&#8221;]Access Decision[\/vc_button][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][\/vc_accordion_tab][\/vc_accordion][\/vc_column][\/vc_row]<\/p>\n<\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>[vc_row unlock_row_content=&#8221;yes&#8221; row_height_percent=&#8221;0&#8243; override_padding=&#8221;yes&#8221; h_padding=&#8221;7&#8243; top_padding=&#8221;7&#8243; bottom_padding=&#8221;7&#8243; back_image=&#8221;166597&#8243; back_position=&#8221;center center&#8221; overlay_alpha=&#8221;50&#8243; overlay_color_blend=&#8221;multiply&#8221; gutter_size=&#8221;3&#8243; column_width_percent=&#8221;100&#8243; shift_y=&#8221;0&#8243; z_index=&#8221;0&#8243; bottom_divider=&#8221;gradient&#8221; css_animation=&#8221;scroll-trigger&#8221; animation_state=&#8221;end&#8221; animation_origin=&#8221;center&#8221; [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":166607,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-167002","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/dev.creativewalkers.com\/pa\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/167002","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/dev.creativewalkers.com\/pa\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/dev.creativewalkers.com\/pa\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dev.creativewalkers.com\/pa\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dev.creativewalkers.com\/pa\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=167002"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/dev.creativewalkers.com\/pa\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/167002\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":167186,"href":"https:\/\/dev.creativewalkers.com\/pa\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/167002\/revisions\/167186"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dev.creativewalkers.com\/pa\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/166607"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/dev.creativewalkers.com\/pa\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=167002"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}